WHO AND WHOM
(Specially written for "The Press" by ARNOLD WALL.) BECAUSE he is so familiar a figure we do not regard the uniformed policeman as remarkable though he is not dressed like anybody else. Something like this has happened with “who.”
“Who” is one of a small family—“who,” “what,” “which" and “why”—all the other three are pronounced with. initial “w” in Southern English and “wh” in New Zealand according to tradition, but the "wh” in “who” is pronounced as simple “h” —“hop.” In Anglo-Saxon the spelling, was “hwa” with long “a.” The “hw” did not stand for “h” plus “w” but was a device to represent the •‘sharp” sound of. “w” so that “hw” and “w” are a pair like “f” and “v," “p” and “b,” “s” and “z” and so on.
The long “a” of AngloSaxon normally became long “o” in modern English, “ham” became “home,” “ban” became “bone” and so on. Thus “hwa” would have become “hwoh” with long “o” but for the “labialising” influence of the “w” under which it became “whoo” (in later spelling the “hw” becomes “wh.”) This looks like the owl’s “tu-whit, tu whoo” doesn’t it? For a time it was so pronounced according to the old students of the pro-
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19650807.2.119
Bibliographic details
Press, Volume CIV, Issue 30823, 7 August 1965, Page 12
Word Count
208WHO AND WHOM Press, Volume CIV, Issue 30823, 7 August 1965, Page 12
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Press. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.