DEFENDANT ALLEGES PERJURED EVIDENCE

Press, Volume CIII, Issue 30478, 27 June 1964, Page 18

DEFENDANT ALLEGES PERJURED EVIDENCE

few* Efefefe HteK feWMHfefe

XSW KJOBOCTH. tene & - Ai wXW.iwriiinii few: Mcwrfe wafeaee ts tear* a rrsaeao Ste feet p®Ht st fee SApremt Can? was uafee Mr a fsiTßer otaar fe fee Macwffl'teY Ctart ar Pfeaa fefegrTSe aTegafeir was mit *f S?®m? Crary _QMte» vfej? fe <» fefewfenr at 183532 H 90K3S£ 293 K th «rar a essri irtar sar jrassess -nx ®f sans ami fefe - fesfe st a erri arant. Tie juKKzf st fee actant ▼as Mass fair? Starr 1 writer. iy Jt I. J Ssbhk Jtr A W- Tara. SJL «wrf ie wrfei rate* ax tr-asr 5w CaGErt 25 taut wer fee feSa rut ui tete isst u w«S £7 cwes «ai c wfeamaatf 1 ?ee£ Cssfen siiki fee Ctan ie tad refesea a feife twer fee tHeszaess femse tf fee Mfere fee safedcess icaae wssor fans at" fee Sanrsase Cacrt

wfete fee feSaa fcr Jiiiife«< . feas teang setet ■ *■ 3far " —* iTS ■ *inTtowitf fee <»e fetes Sy Cattea tefer ■« ■»- . feawfe arter tet tea feMle ,at Sew ffefewatk aa Jim. 3S. . uafeoa aaaa< few WfJ- , m* was te alter «"■» ter fee ae» a w M tete sawtee » W *» atettetr fcifnny fee. BSt U* fe*W<r -aas ate gneawt. -antst X *■ fees « » feß»-