Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CLAIM FOR FEES

Action By Law

Finn Fails

Free* AMOdaNon)

AUCKLAND. July 11. A firm of SPihcitoM who sued * client for a fee of £l3O and expenses of £2 4s Bor services rendered oy a senior partner, in hi* capacity ao a barrister, were grunted only the expenses in a written decimon by Mr R. M. Grant. SM . in the Magistrate’s Court ait Auckland today.

The firm was Robinson and Morgan-CoakJe, who sought to recover a total of £152 4s from a workman, John Patrick Behan, for services rendered by Michael Robinson. “The claim, in so far as it relates to a barrister's fee is, in my view, irrecoverable,” said the Magistrate. “It would have been recoverable as a disbursement had the plaintiff flrm paid this sum out to a barrister even although he be a partner.

“This was not the esse. The only disbursements paid were £2 45.”

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19620712.2.10

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume CI, Issue 29872, 12 July 1962, Page 3

Word Count
149

CLAIM FOR FEES Press, Volume CI, Issue 29872, 12 July 1962, Page 3

CLAIM FOR FEES Press, Volume CI, Issue 29872, 12 July 1962, Page 3