LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Press, Volume C, Issue 29557, 5 July 1961, Page 8

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

l. Letters sent to the Editor for printing must be written in ink on one side of the paper only, and writers must send in ttwlr names and addresses in full, whether they wish these to be published or not 1 Writers must say cieeHj whether or not their letters are being or have been sent to other papers 3 The Editor cannot return or keep any letter which for any reason is unsuitable foe printing, nor can he acknowledge unsuitable letters, although this will be done where it seems to be needful, or enter into any correspondence *- Letter* must not be of more than ISO words u> length Ypres—£lsB.sl3, S. W Hickmott.—Barely relevant GA L.—We have space for only one critic: and we believe him to be both competent and fair. Let's Face It.—Your letter would have a little relevance if the town hall were to b« used only for concerts. T. H. Bitmead—Your letter read: "Mr Lake uses as the excuse for not making tax cuta this year . . ." What he said was that "substantial tax cuts are not possible this year"—a very different thing from saying there will not be tax cuts this year. By Gum - n’ All Lad.—You appear to misunderstand the position. Britain refused the opportunity of being a foundation member of the Common Market, which would have allowed her some say in the drafting of the Rome Treaty. It is hardly realistic to complain now of Germany and Italy '‘dictating'’ terms.