MAYOR’S METHODS CRITICISED
j “FORCED MEETING TO APPROVE ” . MJ AUCKLAND, October 31. Cntmsm of the way the Mayor of - W-Tand (Mr J. A. C. Allum) brouHht ■ mart his orooosal for a £350.000 • winemorial was made at a meeting 3 ! , of the Auckland Cham“r of Commerce this mornins. when J™ l 75 ® ade ° f “considerable mention from local bodies and serwmen s organisations. The president of the Chamber of -■ Mr T. M Davis) said the , Byer should have set un a planning ®™ttee first, which would have S'., ".ronosals from all interested - S’ ■ a view to placing proft “fere citizens, who. after all, ft cos * °f *be memorial, ft I ’!?’• Mr A - Win - • he tlle Mayor had the meeting on the memorial Jah i approve the scheme, alZzv i? * a . rge sec tion thought ap*"l should be deferred.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19461101.2.79
Bibliographic details
Press, Volume LXXXII, Issue 25021, 1 November 1946, Page 11
Word Count
137MAYOR’S METHODS CRITICISED Press, Volume LXXXII, Issue 25021, 1 November 1946, Page 11
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Press. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.