“IMPUDENT OFFENCE”
FINE OF £75 FOR BUILDING BREACH (P.A.) AUCKLAND, August 21.
“The offence seems to have been a most impudent one,” said Mr F. H. Levien, S.M., giving a reserved decision to-day on information brought on August 2 against R. J. Kerridge who, it was alleged, proceeded with the construction of a bathing shed without a permit from a local authority. Kerridge was fined £75 and costs. The Magistrate said he had viewed the locality. It had been stated in evidence that first-class bricks were used, and he could see no reason to qualify that evidence.
After commenting that the materials used in the construction of the bathing shed might have been used for housing, the Magistrate said: “This was a perfectly flagrant breach of the regulations and should be punished accordingly.”
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19460822.2.19
Bibliographic details
Press, Volume LXXXII, Issue 24960, 22 August 1946, Page 3
Word Count
133“IMPUDENT OFFENCE” Press, Volume LXXXII, Issue 24960, 22 August 1946, Page 3
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Press. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.