Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MONEY FOR RUSSIA

Sir,—An editorial from “The Press" of November 8 has just reached me, entitled ‘‘Money for Russia.” To me it seems not only ill considered but ill informed. It says “A loan of 1,000,000,000 dollars is some marks on a piece of paper and about as useful to Stalin in the present crisis of Russia’s affairs as a loan of 10 cents or an illuminated address. Russia needs lanks. . , . Russia has enough gold . . . ■to pay for all the United States is iikely to send for a long time to come.” The billion dollars was a credit established against Russian purchases from the United States, primarily for machine tools and equipment to build an immense tank factory in Russia: so it was no idle “token” or “symbol,” even if it was but a few marks on paper. You go on to say that all United States shipping has been withdrawn from the San Francisco-Vladivostok route in favour of Boston-Archangel on the “unconvincing excuse" that the latter is shorter. Or isn’t it? I think you will know now, anyway, that the major supply requirements were in the west, and that anything to obviate or at least relieve the ever-congested trans-Siberian railway shipments was welcome.—Yours, etc., C. D. E. BARKER. Premier, 8.C.. Canada, December 14. 1041.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19420317.2.69.3

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume LXXVIII, Issue 23589, 17 March 1942, Page 7

Word Count
215

MONEY FOR RUSSIA Press, Volume LXXVIII, Issue 23589, 17 March 1942, Page 7

MONEY FOR RUSSIA Press, Volume LXXVIII, Issue 23589, 17 March 1942, Page 7