CRITICISM OF POULTRY BOARD

Press, Volume LXXII, Issue 21708, 15 February 1936, Page 7

CRITICISM OF POULTRY BOARD

■J M CANTERBURY member

■to criticism of the Board at a called by the ,Christ* Council. of the New Federation WsmzmzSL'. evening was made -by Marshall, Canterbury proHKgHPiaentative on the board, ■|H§<y v• : ■ ■>/ v ; >■

esE?issa^a“a < tg press themselves is a s^^. of n f r^ hp Sion to me M » member of the Poultry Board, .. .1 “if Mr Morgan Wiillamsand some of the other critics of the • board had ■ taken the trouble to study the Poultry Runs Registration Act. 1 am convinced that much, of the not have been made, ?or years tne pput {^industryhas suffetedacutely from Poultry Runs and purely an organising measure, and me board eefr up under the- eet was charged with the responsibility of organising those producers wt<» make fra?s» toy the production of eggs for sale. r f | f 4 * ( ' t W

“For the last two year# the board has eoneentrated to that * oroducetK would be enabled to meet together and Indicate what the indtietry required. It la Ssy todeateSvßt Am i«Jjg difficult to eonstruet. What the industry needs to»day is . wreckers, and I hopethatpr oducers win attend the meeting to be held next Thursday, when I will (W toWJ tunity rallying hi detail to ®®, I*® 1 *® of the criticisms made at the meeting held,this week,”