Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MEASUREMENT OF BATHING COSTUMES.

TO THK EDITOR OH THE IJHSSS. Sir, —As a law-abiding being I have no quarrel with the Sumner and New Brighton Councils, who have decided the measurements of the regulation bathing costume, but I do think they are thoughtless to wait until December to tnrust such a by-law on the unfortunate public, most of whom, purchased their costumes weeks ago. When I bought mine, which exposes eleven instead of nine inches of my back I asked at the shop, if apropos of recent newspaper controversy, they had made enquiries, and I was assured that my costume and the many more revealing ones they had sold, would be permitted o"h our beaches —so when I disport myself on the sands at Sumner or New Brighton, I trust that no beach inspector wearing an expression of conscious rectitude —and, of course, his regulation bathing suit—will be rash enough to place a detaining hand on my shoulder —for I shall certainly go mad and bite hiai. —\ours, etc., SUN WORSHIPPER. December 20th, 1932.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19321222.2.47.4

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume LXVIII, Issue 20736, 22 December 1932, Page 9

Word Count
174

MEASUREMENT OF BATHING COSTUMES. Press, Volume LXVIII, Issue 20736, 22 December 1932, Page 9

MEASUREMENT OF BATHING COSTUMES. Press, Volume LXVIII, Issue 20736, 22 December 1932, Page 9