WAITAKI DAM.

Press, Volume LXVII, Issue 20302, 30 July 1931, Page 8

WAITAKI DAM.

PROFESSOR HOIQ^'I £4OOO ASKED FOR I An implication that been imposed upon by in reporting upon the puni hydro-electric Bchflra^ East), in the House of lars of the dealings Hornell and the "The Minister hag Professor discussed the Wj^tafiijll that it was thought a was unnecessary. We know what was in his rq^||j|||^B informed—l do not information is sound or ifcrallHß Professor was sent to purpose of reporting, ment paid his expenseiT^^g^B back to ChristchuTch Minister informing htm' 'ssP§k|sH^ pared to write a report.iragrajH treated as liberally at in connexion with words, he wanted £3ooo' How liberally did Mr Sernple: I £4OOO for a report thtf 1 fejllgSgH any ordinary engineer iii at any rate, could have an hour. In addition feasor went away witk.« connexion with other ' preliminary examination! schemes, and I am tttilSwjgjgltl boarded the ship and New Zealand ho said est nation of mugs hs The surmise that had been paid £4OOO Taverner, who said wanted a similar upon Waitaki, but the Government did noCul^J^^B been suggested. He early last October, had been told before,- iheAK^E^B certain aspects of certain suggestions 4^f||i|^B cal nature, relating/ and the extension o£ Professor; Hornell to report on lar fee to that paid Mr SempJe: £4ooof The Minister: Tes, fcs but was not engaged.- * The Prime seemed to be cause Hornell -Hngnfflß £4OOO for a report/but eqHUMnHL the Christchurch City £IO,OOO for a report rlri power scheme. was a man with hydro-electric Work, £4OOO for-a report - Mr Forbes: Utt 1 doesn't seem to. is different from* South Island and ft volcanic rock. a very sound fonndati|ro^^^^^^gMr Forbes added. its report on ATftpta^j^^WH^p and- the report had reassurance to the'