CORRESPONDENCE.

Press, Volume LXVI, Issue 20038, 20 September 1930, Page 17

CORRESPONDENCE.

_ (fenMpondents who do sot comply with B?w,'*elw set out in the last column of our * - 'MUr P*t a will excuse as from noticing tottersthe Reform Act, 1532, the £lO y§|l»|wfflehold suffrage in respect of ParBpWta/fjlunintaiy reptescntation was granted in pfi i. ''" bOttOUSh» to men 21 years of age' end iy 1 " timi under the same enactment the h M&rige is counties was extended to Si 1 \ -MRyboldem. to leaseholders lor terms of ■Pff-SMHk » tenanta at will paying rent el MX per annum; in addition to the 40s %e* «Inaholaera. This - atill left five-sixths of Wftf the male adult population of England a vote. By the second Reform HjllNfiet/ot 1867, the working classes were KSM.f4wtted to the franchise in boroughs ■Bfir the introduction of the household lUlßpißMftise, i.e., inhabitant occupation Bffffjftitttaii any minimum restriction as to ||||i nana! value. The Bepreseitation of the People Act, 1918, enfranchised women -the first' time (80 yearn of age and Pjppww), abolished the property qualificaKw'ijto rad removed the pauper disqualfifjrfe «*tion. la 1828 the ago restriction in of women voters was removed, voting' age made the same atf Disgusted."—Give your name and iJIPj-MiaxeM and your complaints -will be ■gg/ißMtigated. HlHp^Webb.—Tour letter would provoke a HQMM)asfa»m*y for which we have no space.