Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PREFERENCE TO UNIONISTS.

AUSTRALIAN WATERSIDERS' CASE. (BT CABLE—PHE33 ASSOCIATION—COPT3IOHT.) (AUSTRALIAN AND N.Z. CABLB ASSOCIATION.) MELBOURNE, February 2. In the Commonwealth Arbitration Court, his Honour, Mr Justico Beeby, in delivering judgment in tho waterside workers' claim, deferred the question of preference, stating that before deciding the claim he wishes the executive of tho Federation to consider whnt steps it is prepared to take to ensure the observance of the award, and prevent branches imposing local rules and issuing orders to members, contrary to the award of the Court. At present he had not formed an opinion that preference was necessary.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19270203.2.81

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume LXIII, Issue 18916, 3 February 1927, Page 9

Word Count
99

PREFERENCE TO UNIONISTS. Press, Volume LXIII, Issue 18916, 3 February 1927, Page 9

PREFERENCE TO UNIONISTS. Press, Volume LXIII, Issue 18916, 3 February 1927, Page 9