NEW BRIGHTON BRIDGE.

Press, Volume LX, Issue 18151, 14 August 1924, Page 11

NEW BRIGHTON BRIDGE.

07 "TB® PBSSS. O*®*" onlooker, I have/taken Lttitudes of the t P^^T^bdics-towards the pro*^sSyw^i" Brigb ™' the opinions ex|Sv?fn%" v ofTh" 'jfjsali''®". /w- of the chief causes v jjtttfT. . narrowness of the Tart**" This is indeed a bad rftiSil used by so mucn fasH it has resulted in Lift- of collisions (as tf to replace the damaged ,j^« w wifv). This defect i»^ DS «*rn the Tramway Boara, ioes oot «®^j ts characteristic attiAgain, ifc is «* n the - rIVC J- &h ° uld be questioned, a our;fcis* t of the north side of «&?£«•* s» f sct l! r •hf. I)ria? . inking or the.. piles. Kting rimher have been mrertcd the se i el 01 in ervfj".- Furthermore, the ap;bo fL city side is awkward tiTfact that th© bridge is w'£Sp«>X;»i.v to ivnicli ons+.n:c-is motorists and oth°r3, !fadmeeting in tho middle Mfie..•.wd-JannK fo , back gSI nbt fnrtljer encroach on rf "' ilSke space, though of nor deventilation. TheCouncil and the Bosrd should certainly hear why should bodies shirk their nwpontifKben thrfr ratepavers use-the S atobst as frequently as br;c-h-Tt is .indeed a pity that f 1 w£s do not adopt a more syroSfjc attitad^whOT.; the local ConnTCTbo readily shown ur w!hngf« meet them.—Yonrs. eu-.. 5® BYSTA'XI) ER._ ye, EiigWon, August 12th. .. ..