UNKNOWN

Press, Volume LX, Issue 17982, 28 January 1924, Page 12

UNKNOWN

'pi, •,, ' - > *"^ > 1 ana Darta TnateSS of Ineome ft, !&?* 31st > »*, +?3n In Grant's ts»»CK fault after year. £V*4 nmieatSoa J»g that tb« saio^f^

ipenso involve s&lS* ferencc and ?sM»*> jTJ The nnmbft returns was so <m£3N would JmnwpalCS* .Dwiujita. T<,p^ : bnt a « c^^^ nnnlly during enucavour, tc TsriiSS tho public. brought bofo» l)»Tf tho Courts anfttoiS assisted the D«SSj| tho desired inftfee?? Mont quite on the question arasj His remarks vioualy before mora to tho dtttaw|3 ticular case, . Wkgd ■ ttio Dcpartffißhfc iiffm .trcrnely hap}y jfejFJ there wcro 80 TSK} af! The defendaßtfycsjS a return was true, ag,%J,|s3 that thia be a complata tttßttgj come. Therf t&JEJji to alter the prr>ased, Gtaift jigM and fined £B,*£*HjS Mr J. the ease tmis ;IBbssjs defendant Md i§M#k gested by covered that when 6, sum bern paid. which he tra* been no t'ix s<ss<§ The MagMtn&fmH case in -whiijH ft-Mj had failed te'M§!&j had sonfe no tax was p#&«| since bern inww»fe| had been aant«lf&sg| from tbo Ispp*fifeM that every,. turns. TnAe'r t J?pSS Court costs ( ? *ljP|||