Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

BRITISH PARLIAMENT.

THE USE OF AN ANCIENT STATUTE.

DEBATE ON UNEMPLOYMENT.

United Press Association—By Electric Telegraph—Copyright. (Received March 3rd, 11.30 p.m.)

LONDON, March 3. A Nationalist motion condemning +ho Government for using a /statute oT"Edward 111. for the conviction , of Mr. Farrell, M.P., was defeated by 142 votes to 18. Labour members sharply attacked Mr. Burns's administration of the Unemployment Act, alleging that it was ungenerous. Mr. Pickersgill said he did not think women workers in London had been fairly dealt with compared with men. Mr. Burns justified his action in not sanctioning tho establishment of a farm colony for women. It would be useless to transfer charwomen at a cost of £200 a-piece to teach them market gardening. He had made grants and sanctioned loans wherever he was satisfied that these were necessary.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19090304.2.37

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume LXV, Issue 13364, 4 March 1909, Page 7

Word Count
134

BRITISH PARLIAMENT. Press, Volume LXV, Issue 13364, 4 March 1909, Page 7

BRITISH PARLIAMENT. Press, Volume LXV, Issue 13364, 4 March 1909, Page 7