Article image
Article image

H_ I__s tes fcgalf lllifPM " My" little daughter Linda, 1 'aged 2_ years, was r . TI . nT .- tlpi ,...,■,.v,,...» »iwl'jm troubled) with | -, ( >v^r^^? : bronchitis.and j l although I j Vt tried many preparations, did not get MB&§f% gS| any better ; I' very often I I wa f ke - D i! awake with 1 her aU night. j|B<f-> % 1 After the first Mjfcisi. J bottle of ,^^^ r --__J SCOTT'S Emulsion, her cough was almost gone, and she was eating Mi ! sleepMg well I continued SCOTTS and now she is quite cured, and twice the size she was before." MAY McKELLAR. 91 Princes Street, Church Hill, N.S.W. 29/7/07. Above is the Proof in the Facts. Here is Proof in the Reason Why: The reason ifl that of the numerous competitive emulsions (all copied from SCOTTS which is the original), none is made of the same intensely nourishing ingredients by the unrivalled SCOTT process. The advantages secured by the SCOTT process are perfect digestibility and absence of nauseous taste and smell, both supremely important points where delicate children are concerned. Therefore, when purchasing, don't ask for " Emulsion; " ask for and get Emulsion —the difference between them means a core for you < See that the Flshmari With the FWI is on the package. Of all Chemists and Dealers in medicine. imii nil 11

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19081017.2.6.2

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume LXIV, Issue 13249, 17 October 1908, Page 2

Word Count
219

Page 2 Advertisements Column 2 Press, Volume LXIV, Issue 13249, 17 October 1908, Page 2

Page 2 Advertisements Column 2 Press, Volume LXIV, Issue 13249, 17 October 1908, Page 2