Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

COURT OF APPEAL

■ - ■ * . ' (nxn ASSOCIATION TW-IOBAM.) WELLINGTON, October 11. In the Appexl Court to-day the case of the Bank of New Zealand, as the successor to Che Assets Realisation ' Board, v. the District Land Registrar :at Auckland was argued. The Board owned the Waitoa Estate, Oh»- ---» nerouri, of 26,000 acres. Their predecessors in '■ 1884 subdivided X the estate, -for sale, «nd de~ ' posited a plan; ghoirin« a certain road, in the Land Transfer Oißce, Auckland, but they continued to work the estate > ac * sheep station, *nd only sold one section. .When in 1904 the Board de- ' cided to subdivide and make another * plan ignoring the existence of the Toads, they found they had been used and rights acquired over, them. The original roads were accordingly restored, but the t reliefer of a section fronting one of them wee refused on the ground that it did not front a public road, and there was evidence that the Act of 1905 ha<] been complied with. Mr Justice . Denniston held that there -was no evi- > dence that the roads had been dedi- ' ected to the public. The question of law i was removed to the Appeal Court, and i at the same time appellants appealed • on the facts. Mr Skerrett, K.C., with i him Mr Hanan, appeared for ippeli lant; Mr Chapman, X.C, with him Mi ■ Swarbrick, for respondent. The Court reserved ite decision.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19071012.2.14

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume LXIII, Issue 12933, 12 October 1907, Page 3

Word Count
231

COURT OF APPEAL Press, Volume LXIII, Issue 12933, 12 October 1907, Page 3

COURT OF APPEAL Press, Volume LXIII, Issue 12933, 12 October 1907, Page 3