ARBITRATION COURT.
THE TAILORS , DISPUTE. 4<|i
The Arbitration Court opened to tinge in Christchurclr at the Council Chamber yesterday, when tSt^ , dispute in the tailoring trade vu ÜbeM" The three members of tihe Court wn»«|f present: Mr Justice Cooper (pßaidtal)£JS*Alx S. Brown (representative for Uμ. mm: ployers), and Mr.R. Slater for the Union*). , ■ ,-"••§£§• The hearing of the dispute hid l*«lif partially completed at a former the Court, and was adjourned for. tfcff§ purpose of obtaining an eacpert'e_ upon- a log for pieoe work. "' ,*%>*s The expert* selected were Gohns (for the Union) and T. K«nr"tfortti£s employew), and their report vu fntwtoWjP to the Court in December laat. ■<■$$£$ Messrs E. Qobne and C. J. appeared for the Union at the hearjng.eaf:;~ : , Messrs F. W. Hobbs, J. Mitchell, aid JJ£s W. Barm for the employers. - •' ~ tr 'sss An application was made by Mr T; K*BKl| for leave to amend hie report- ~ ■ : M%l Mr Hobus stated that the ChriMiol«wh% employen would be prepared to B4eeptftlj£% Dunedin award. •' -"i-'V-bf^s The President eaid it was snreaaoaebtl~'M to ask the Court to put the experts'- jtfP port aside. - : ~*vWs Mr Hobba eaid that if the ameadjntatS| proposed by Mr Kerr were adopted/ , w&M employen would accept fhe log. ..-< -\iwSf| After further discussion, hie 'HwME&I stated that the Court would consider \t%,[| appUceUon {or leave to. amend the «P«t, r s| and would give judgß>pot/ttt twoo'ooriti:^ When the Court rammed at twoVcloekjfM' the President intimated that the not prepared to allow the log wpMfe by the experts to be amended or *mJHg£*ski and the application of the «nploywf , eipk£&, be refused. ■.■■■;* . - '-V^fsK Evidence was then led by the Uni«t;l|fl support of their proposal* relating conditions of woric, including,* of hours from 48 to 45, the ind«nte&|||| of apprentices, and the proportion of prentices to journeymen, the boon ot«f*s»|j| time, and the payment for w«itmg;.<Min»r^ Bobeon Willie said thai he the tailoring trade for about & 7****i'*fil of which were spent is 'New Zmaad, VWM the remainder in England., ApFr*ntkfcj|| should be indentured, for such * {rraostang was better for all parties. £3 a''w«*)f| should be a fair rate of pay for-a'taflipg In New Zealand. •• . r ''ii^S Meesre C.l Baynon, W. J. Hob«i«;,wi| T. Butterfield, W. E. Muoday, P. He«w« and T. Armstrong, who were called by tMip Union representative, gave .W«fe the case was adjourned till tils mo«il^|p|
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19030331.2.8
Bibliographic details
Press, Volume LX, Issue 11546, 31 March 1903, Page 2
Word Count
389ARBITRATION COURT. Press, Volume LX, Issue 11546, 31 March 1903, Page 2
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.