Page 2 Advertisements Column 6

Press, Volume LVIII, Issue 11110, 31 October 1901, Page 2

l -$- makes each sopplo B y meal nicer 1 «i.«oe«. and I ■4 s, digestion. . . . . I ; m aS jHßfiJßfislfifl» fl mEL k #»jS ft All' JB I Ji AS SUPPL!ED T0 THE Stocked in ChristckuTch by DALGETY "AND CO., LTD., GRIER&ON AND DAVIS, tJJSSS' OHBR, HUALPREYS AND CO.. and E. W. ROPER AND 00Stocked in Chrietohurch by DALGETY. "2LND CO., LTD., GRIERSON" ANft DAVIS, I?LEP« : CH£R, AND CO., and E. W. KOPER AND CO. Cγ. McHaffie said he. had been unable them to '^company. , "'ifc''wef, therefore, •■ to attend the conference, owing to stated that on hearing that the Council;... Hβ was against a> paid Tramway' Board, W as prepared to consider favourably the ~ but thought a board oi .ratepayers might granting ol a request to delegate each , be setup. He was, however, dead against authority, plans and specifications of the . the City Council taking control qf the proposed line would be prepared, so at -, \ tramways. It was the suburbs really, to gire the Council all detailed informa- '• .";- and not the city that supported the trams, tion regarding the scheme. • - '.:'■• l Cr.. Gough said if tlipre had been no The.matter .was discussed in. commitcity there would be no trams from the tee, tihe Chairman reporting eventually that '"■ 1 suburbs. the Committee, after favourably discuss* -:-. Cr. Bennie said they-4iad previously de- ing the question, recommended that the - r: cided not to support any tramway trusts. etter "be reoeived, and that the CotmoSl *"■ It was time they had an up-to-date sys- approves of the tramway. tern, although it wae nob to be expected . ■ ■" . ~ that the present company would expend BABY large eums of money in improvements . n ■ ,t: \ritiiout further substantial concessions. . ■ tsEmJ UKES ' Hβ did not favour further concessions, but . W//( ta ™ ■ ~ that the City Council or the people who ' r|»- ', used the trams should take oontrpl. <y •" . . Mr Woolf objected to a paid tmst, hold- Isisk JA ing the view that an elected trust of re- . k presentatives from the districts through " ■ ■"" which the tramways passed should form t£e 1 \ V A \ controlling body. " ~ k .<«? ' Cr. Dunlop held similar views, and op- a a 5a ' posed the City Council taking control. V Finally it was resolved that the Conn- \YI | JK>yfr/Fflyfc7^:Vg, la ' cil's representatives be instructed to .vote \ I I \JjW 'fyLZ^jjßliALn against a paid .trust, but to support, an ' 11 1 vfn?Sf§lSS»'jf '• - efectiye'trust of ratepayers from the vari- I \ fg Ifxhtf'wr ous districts served by the tramways. I W J I ter A was deceived 8 fmm JmtTm? *l£jl donald, managing director of the Christ-. pleasure and benefit. It* miisfonli to cool \, church Tramway Company, Ltd.,* stating and cleanse the blood in eczem* and otbet . that the public of Kiccarlon and Temple- soap cleanse the surface of cruets »nd ecale, ton districts were desirous of having a and gentle anointings with Cctiodra Olafa tramway laid starting from opposite the meataoothe and heatitchlng, b<uniaga)tln» ■ Christehurch Hospital, round the Park to . gold wiywhere. ro»Jjmdepet.«F. Hnr«»r,XM« the Plough Inn, and from there up the Riccarton road, and South road to the . - ' ' racecourse. The company had,been as- n . TT -nvAmwna avxxrrurn gored that the Eipcarton and Templeton * " Road Boards would support the scheme JftAUiLUXJSiCS. j : • , in every way possible. Under "The s ' Tramways Act, 1894," the authority for The Davis Vertical Peed ia the only higl the construction of new lines could* only class machine. with boll bearings. Bind be granted to county councils for lines this latest improvement its , popularity ha* outside a borough, bufc such councils bad increased by leaps and bounds. Free lea* '. ■ power, with the consent of the ratepayers, eons, free trial, five yean* guarantee. Mb»« to delegate the authority so conferred on wa and Co., sole agent*, 220 Colombo street*