APPEAL COURT.
(FBJE3S ASSOCIATION TEtiORAM.) WELLINGTON, October 16. The Appeal Court was occupied to-da; \rith the cas* of Rjddiford v Warren aji< others, an appeaJ from, the .decision of thi Chkf Justice. Tb* respondent** who ar> cheep farmers, at PAhiatua, contracted t< sellall tbeir lambs for th« season to the ai> pellant, but repudiated the agreement or tfc ground of niiereprtsenttttion by the appel lant-'s agent. The. latter brougiit» suit fv £260 homages, and the Chief Justicfe helt that thei-e had been = inisiepresentetion though innocent, .and .entitling the respua ' dents toTescfnd the contract. Th& apjjea involves consideration of the present oondi tiori of the law regard to the effect of in nocent misrepareeentatioh < on contract said or purchase. Argument for the. appellani was concluded this afternoon. Argumeni ' for the respondent will be taken to-morroM morning. • .
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19011017.2.11
Bibliographic details
Press, Volume LVIII, Issue 11098, 17 October 1901, Page 2
Word Count
135APPEAL COURT. Press, Volume LVIII, Issue 11098, 17 October 1901, Page 2
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.