MAGISTERIAL.

Press, Volume LI, Issue 8962, 28 November 1894, Page 2

MAGISTERIAL.

CHRISTCHURCH;

Wednesday, November 27.

(Before R. Beetham, Esq., S.M.) Prohibitiok Obdee. —-A proMbttiffli order was granted against Willism Frttoi Ford, to have effect, in the GtoMm Avon, nnd Riccarton districts. • ___. jT_-__sr___E o_n_n>_t. ______ Attoß- - fl_l)| VMf|M n\WW wiw»^iu.p|r, the property o£ William Brice, wO« nil* charged on the.understanding that bis f»**» r punished him. , na Civil Cases.—Johns v Ward, elsia. *» for balance due on the pnr_b_-e.of -**« stacks of atraWt Mi Deacon for. piM 8 ™ j Mr Swann for defendant, who J_tfc _*■ counter claim of £3 for straw detain*^ The counter claim war nob allojwto w judgment was given for plaint S lot'lM amount claimed, with costs. Ru»»» ». Bolton, claim £38 2s, balance charged « * bill of costs os money di.barted. »r Bruges appeared for the plaintifc pefeaeww pleaded that the expenses had been .&• r curred without authority, but evidence »w produced directly di-proving this, and jn-W ment for the plaintiff was for the amonn* claimed with costs. Osborne v CnrW* claim , £20 for damages by , Mr Kussell for plaintiff, Mr.Fmg*., for defendant. The parties ',■ joining sections at Lake Ellesmere, abW which there had been litigation. JJJ-; October 26th plaintiff found defendant Wl* - a surveyor on his (plaintiff's) vnf^f^L', intention being to take levels, &c As m permission had been sought or obtoiaw plaintiff objected and some high woras took place, and finally, the party, being ordered off, went-oWS£ but returned, and in the plain iffs »Jseoee made some part of a survey. Plaintiff »<«j mode a claim as above, aud defendant M» paid into Court 5s as satisfaction ol M» cloim. In evidence the material facts were admitted or proved, and judgment wa» given for plaintiff for £2, with costs Judgments went for plaintiffs •V-4«»"" with costs iu Walls v O'Ualloghan £2 l»» Williams, Stepheus and Co. v Mooney ** 19s 8d; Russell v Hooper £5 10«J Jg Percy v Davis £2 10s 6.i. In ***&&£, v Marriott, a claim of £1117s 6d oa i J«*«S ment summons, Mr Bruges ap|*ear_a Mr"" creditor, The debtor agreed to for payment by weekly instalments « * eachf In Kennedy v (WWII, claim. £6 MJ, 6d on judgment summons, the ability oi» debtor to pay was not proved, ond-no »<*»• was made. - .