MAGISTERIAL.

Press, Volume XLIX, Issue 8156, 26 April 1892, Page 3

MAGISTERIAL.

('■-• ■ {IHRISICERJROff. j '" KS&h»a.v, Ai-Btt 25.

« (Boforo IC Wcsteni.'a, ]&q.» J.P.) ! -Dao-S3rjBSSBS3.— Foor first offenders ani Anthony Eerricfc TTor© »U fined 5a and costs for drunkenness. (Before G. A. Proece, Esq., 8.M.) " Cms* Cases.—Beaumont v Rhodes, claim £2218s lOd, a3 part of i'.n award made by I him when acting as arbitrator in tho disI gbsa! of plant and property used in » partj frership concern for tl.e manufacture of llanoiine. Mr Russell for plaintiff Mr j Bill for tho defendant... Tho claim, was ] Resisted oa the ground tliafc matters IJsofc sot out in the dead of submission Iliad been adjudicated upon bj plaintiff, fluid that ho had failed to adjudicate |?ou other matters which were submitted Ito him. There were other objections on I technical points, which tho Courts said I might ba considered by tho ijupromo I Court if proceedings wora taken to sob traside tho award; bat in tho £sc§ of the j deed produced and tho evidence now given, r judgment in the present action must bo for | plaintiff for tho amount claimed, with I costs. Execution to bo stayed for a | fortnight, tho money then to bo paid | into Court in case of appeal. Judgments I went for plaintiffa by default, with costs, ,?- in Orr aad Co. v Murphy, £2 ; Kiucaid v I Toovish, 10s; Joshng v Selfo, £11; and | Adams aad Kippenbergcr v Mackay, £15 ; 12s sd, Hyslop v Olscn was adjourned Mil ■j May 2nd. _ In Chislett v Millard, claim £11 19a 2d ou judgment summons, Mr Russell I appeared for tho debtor. As tho ability of the debtor to pay was not proved, no ordfif was made.