RANGIORA.

Press, Volume XXXI, Issue 4291, 1 May 1879, Page 3

RANGIORA.

TUBBDAY,; APBIXi 29. [Before C. Whitefoora; Esq.] -#" > SIATJQHTBBHOj/sB Acr.—A renewal 'of, license was granted to D. Graham, Southbrook. ..--.-.. ■.. r: ...'... (1: . '. : . : ':-! : Oivm Oasbb.—Gullirer Bros, y A-lilly/ £7 14s 9d; judgment for plaintiffs by default. T. S. Mannering vT. Deneb, £.14, 15e 63 ; judgment for plaintiff. 'Vfj MoCormick tE. Wattine, £1716e,Mr Clark fordefen- ! dant; judgment for plaintiff for amount ancl ooete. T. Schmidt tT. Denoh, £2 6e sd; jndgmenfc for plaintiff by dcfaolt. O. D. Soott t Gt. Hodgson, £4 sa: no appearance. i Bk-hbahths.—ln the caae of S. Early vJ. AraoiehaWj £9, for detention of goods at Cuffe railway station, in which fee Court on January 21st gave judgment for plaintiff for. £5 damages and coste, but whwh wae ftßkedby j the manager of railways to be re-heard on the grotmde that one of the preiiding. justices _at the hearing "was an intere§ted party, having : consigned Uie goods alleged to hare been tamed to the plainfife*, and for the production of additional eyidence, Mr Olark, plaintiff's eoh"citor, asked if the re-hearing was to W granted to the defendant. The Resident Magistrate stated the caao at the time was fully and carefully gona> into, and no valid grounds were set out upon which tbeiolioitor representing ; the manager and defendant could obtain a re-hearing. The order of the Court was that the amount paid "under protest be handci to the plaintiff.