Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

[Before CO. Bowen, Esq,, B.M., rm& a WILFUL DEBTET7CTIOK OP PEOrSEJr. Patrick Byrne.wee brought up charged 'with this offence. The prisoner it appSw bJ gone to Mills' hotel and asked JofJaJS which being refueed be deliberately Imul window. 6 Prisoner pleaded intoxication in defeat saying that he did not know what he w*r doing. Hie Worship inflicted a fine''df 40e end damages, remarking that his plea of intotioa." tion could not be tafcen as an excuse fovioob behaviour. , ' civil. -••■'':■.;; Pratt v Armstrong--Judgment fop■pleintif by default for £21 8s 6d and ooatg. t Lockhart v Craymond—Judgment tiff fqr £31 10s and costs. Lyttelton Savinge , Bank v Qoeton—Jmk, ment for plaintiff for £100 and coats,

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP18690218.2.11

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume XIV, Issue 1826, 18 February 1869, Page 2

Word Count
116

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Press, Volume XIV, Issue 1826, 18 February 1869, Page 2

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Press, Volume XIV, Issue 1826, 18 February 1869, Page 2