PERILOUS LAWS
Board of Trade Act.
NECESSITY FOR REPEAL
In view of the assurance of the Prime Minister that the Government does not intend to introduce any more drastic legislation this coming session, it would be appropriate if the Government divested Itself of some of the drastic powers that lurk in its inherited statutes (says a statement by the Associated Chambers of Commerce). Chief among these is the Board of Trade Act, which has actually been the subject of draft legislation that has not yet, however, seen the light of day. No Redress for Libel.
Under this Act the Minister of Industries and Commerce may exercise the most complete autocracy. He may hold a judicial inquiry or make an investigation into any matter whatsoever relating to any trade, business, profession or undertaking carried on for profit, for the purpose of obtaining information to control them. Such an inquiry must be conducted in private, but the Minister may publish anything ho likes concerning it, ami if in so doing he publicly libels or defames any person, that person is denied any remedy.
i Further, the Minister may make regulations for the establishment of maximum of minimum prices, or rates, for any class of goods 01 services except wages ar remuneration of employees. In fact, the ilinisier is given the absolute right to make regulations for the control, in any way he deems necessary, of any trade, business, profession or undertaking whatsoever carried on for profit. Such are the extraordinary powers bestowed by this Act. When the Act was passed in ll'l!), the people were gravely concerned at the alarming rise in the cost of living, they were perplexed by postwar problems and incensed at Instances of alleging profiteering that had occurred. Consequently, the Act had the support of the whole House. It is clear, however, from Parliamentary speeches at the time, that the House was concerned with the cost of living and the suppression of profiteering, and the constitutional aspect of the Act received no consideration whatever by Parliament. The Act was no doubt an honest attempt to cope with the problem of the times, but the methods adopted were arbitrary and dangerous in the extreme, and there is no reason whatever for retaining the measure any longer. Not a Dead Defter.
It is not sufficient to treat the Act merely as a dead letter, because disuse does not make a law Invalid. For that matter, the Act, far from having fallen into desuetude, was used only recently to issue regulations prohibiting the erection of any new picture theatres unless with the approval of the Minister, who has since exercised his power of prohibition in at least one town in New Zealand. The Act is a standing menace to trade and industry, which are further handicapped by the strong deterrent effect of the Act on the inflow of overseas capital and the employment of local capital. The Act stands as a dire threat to all investors who might consider the launching of some new industrial enterprise, with the result that they play safe < by investing instead in Government bonds and local body debentures. This means that capital, instead of being profitably employed in production and in creating employment, is diverted into non-pro-ductive investments that increase the national and local body debt. Again, when It is remembered that Government departments engage in many trading activities in competition with private concerns, it will be readly seen what use could be made of the Act by Government departments and officials, at the instance of a corrupt or unscrupulous Government, to crush a private trade rival. Great Britain rid herself of a similar measure two years after the war. Successive political Readers in New Zealand have agreed' that the Act is fraught with grave peril to the people, and legislation has been promised but has never appeared. The coming session provides one more opportunity to repeal this most objectionable and highly dangerous measure that has subsisted upon more than a decade of procrastination.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/BOPT19320922.2.34
Bibliographic details
Bay of Plenty Times, Volume LXI, Issue 10921, 22 September 1932, Page 3
Word Count
668PERILOUS LAWS Bay of Plenty Times, Volume LXI, Issue 10921, 22 September 1932, Page 3
Using This Item
NZME is the copyright owner for the Bay of Plenty Times. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons New Zealand BY-NC-SA licence . This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of NZME. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.