Page 4 Advertisements Column 5

Bay of Plenty Times, Volume XLIV, Issue 6664, 12 April 1916, Page 4

d The cup of tea at the office I p The busy man of affairs, who 1 p usually ''hasn't the time to think g |f of tea flavours" is at once cog- 1 P nisant of the different aroma jj p and refreshing qualities of a p Thereafter he specifies «" Amber n p lips lea ror home use —it *» p there occasion to do so. p Let your "office cup" be filled — p with delicious, fragrant, inyigor- — p * ating "Amber Tips ' Tea *j| wmmmm 1 V*~

B New No. 2 Folding Autographic I I BROWNIE I IB ' Si mi ile—Com nao I —Efficient I SH Sold by all Kodak Dealers ■ 11 KODAK (ASIA), LTD. . M TO^_ Wellington. Auckland, Dunedin. 24 - AH Kodak SupoUos, B )ok'ets etc.. ">b:i able from A. J. Mirriilees, CiismUt, Tainn - CITIZENS and SETTLERS PLEASE COMPARE THE TWO CUSTOMS TARIFFS AND REFLECT UPON THEIR INEUUALITr AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH TARIFF. ,JZ This door is practically closed to New Zealand, Flour, per cental 2s ■* 6d Oatmeal and Rolled Oatc £d per 1b equals £4 13s 4d per ton liran and Sharps, per cental Is Potatoes, per cwt Is Butter and Cheese, per lb 3d Wheat, per cental Is 6d Oats, ' per cental Is 6d NEW ZEALAND TARIFF. About 150 per cent, lower than Australia, Is not our door now wide open to Australia ? Flour, per cental 1p Oatmeal and Rolled Oats, in bulk per cental Is Rolled Oats, in packetß, 20 par cent, equal to £d per lb Bran and Sharps, per cental, Is Potatoes, per cwt, Is Butter, 20 per cent, equal to 2d per lb Cheese, 20 per cent, equal to Id per lb Wheat, per cental, 9d Oats, per cental, 9d IF THESE DUTIES, ARE REMOVED HOW WOULD THtf NEW ZEALAND FATtMER FARE?, ,N.ls.— Mi Hogg and other Single Tax enthusiasts do not suggest the, removal of the duties on the raw materials, wheat, oats, etc. It is obvious they are " running with the hare and hunting with the hounds," tbeir object being to kill the grain;growing and milling, industries with their numerous adjuncts, such as Southern railways, etc., and naturally, the shrinkage would have to be met by increasing the Northern railageß, etc. Their theory is one tax on the land only and free trade. When this was given birth to, the Asiatic problem was unhatched. What encouragement would there be to go on the land unless the products of the soil are protected, on the same lines as cur rivals ? How would our town industries thrive under such stupidity ? Could they compete against the sweated surplusages of the world, unless amply protected ? And even now it is with a struggle they exist. It is obvious the Single Tax theory .is only one tax on the land, and if given effect to would abolish the Alien Poll Tax, and briDg ■] -is down to the Asiatic level. V v:« t.MI/ ; ■"' CHlPiors /CQMON-SENSE