Tho Dreyfus Case

Bruce Herald, Volume XXX, Issue 3097, 8 September 1899, Page 1

Tho Dreyfus Case

9 Major Hartman gave powerful evidence in support of Drey fun. Esterhazv'e guilt was shown by professor Bavest through solecism in thw bordereau. The Army cor^'d mai rauvrei bave been abandoned in consequence of changes iv the general Btaff. Exceptional measures have b;-eo taken to protect livea after the verdict was pronounced in the Rennea court martial. When the prosecution referred to & fresh dossier, M Labori demanded the complete revelation of all the documents and accuied them of refusing to produce evidence that would compromisu Esterhazp. It is stattd that if Drevfu3 ia condemned an appeal will be lodged on the ground of irregularities in ch-3 method and conduct of the tiial. Seoßationsl evidence given btfore the court-martial showed that although the prosecution of 1894 antedated the bordereau Apiil, the documents enumerated could not have existed till May 28. B j aure Paire's witness, an Austro- Hungarian, named Ceena.schi, testified that he heard a Fureign Office official mention Dreyfus as a Germanepy. Germao newrpaperß declare that Carnaschi is an impudent adventurer and a m»dui^n.