Tho Dreyfus Case
9 Major Hartman gave powerful evidence in support of Drey fun. Esterhazv'e guilt was shown by professor Bavest through solecism in thw bordereau. The Army cor^'d mai rauvrei bave been abandoned in consequence of changes iv the general Btaff. Exceptional measures have b;-eo taken to protect livea after the verdict was pronounced in the Rennea court martial. When the prosecution referred to & fresh dossier, M Labori demanded the complete revelation of all the documents and accuied them of refusing to produce evidence that would compromisu Esterhazp. It is stattd that if Drevfu3 ia condemned an appeal will be lodged on the ground of irregularities in ch-3 method and conduct of the tiial. Seoßationsl evidence given btfore the court-martial showed that although the prosecution of 1894 antedated the bordereau Apiil, the documents enumerated could not have existed till May 28. B j aure Paire's witness, an Austro- Hungarian, named Ceena.schi, testified that he heard a Fureign Office official mention Dreyfus as a Germanepy. Germao newrpaperß declare that Carnaschi is an impudent adventurer and a m»dui^n.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/BH18990908.2.3
Bibliographic details
Bruce Herald, Volume XXX, Issue 3097, 8 September 1899, Page 1
Word Count
177Tho Dreyfus Case Bruce Herald, Volume XXX, Issue 3097, 8 September 1899, Page 1
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.