Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

S.S. SICKNESS BENEFIT

Allow me to express my disapproval of the Government's so-called social security. I have a wife and six children under the age of 11 years to maintain and have been unfortunate enough to be laid off work for two weeks. Having paid in approximately £60 per year wage and social security tax since its inception, I applied for a sick benefit for the first time. I have received a warrant for £4 for the second week, (The first week we all have to starve.) To-day an inspector of the Social Security Department, in answer to my question, assured me that if I was receiving a family allowance for my children his Department would only have allowed sufficient to make my total income £4. May I ask why I am expected to maintain a wife and six children on £4 for the first two weeks and buy necessities (bandages, etc., and extra doctor's fees are not recoverable from the fund), when if I was fit and well and only earning £4 per week I would receive my family allowance, £3 weekly, to make a total of £7 to give the children, as the Government says, a reasonable standard of living. Needless to say, I am going back to work, even though my hand is far from being better. The above facts speak for themselves. It's a great insurance for the family man for the modest sum of £60 per year premium. If teaching and talking home truths to my children are heeded by them, I am sure in late years they will be childless. DISCOURAGED FATHER.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19450622.2.51.2

Bibliographic details

Auckland Star, Volume LXXVI, Issue 146, 22 June 1945, Page 4

Word Count
268

S.S. SICKNESS BENEFIT Auckland Star, Volume LXXVI, Issue 146, 22 June 1945, Page 4

S.S. SICKNESS BENEFIT Auckland Star, Volume LXXVI, Issue 146, 22 June 1945, Page 4