CORRESPONDENTS' VIEWS.

Auckland Star, Volume LXXII, Issue 93, 21 April 1941, Page 6

CORRESPONDENTS' VIEWS.

LOCAL ELECTIONS.

tI r. he l.ditor.) A :,;:e;.da„: »ho ha, - lived . , - Car - a half ,t th, InliniM! \ • , lw 11 n ' 'thin the One Trcs Hill Ih'T'ilJ"!] ( «»Un»-il 1 r ,i 1, "• . am asto «nded ■ >•' I am not eligible to .'ho grounds lhal ml i.omc to »v,., rr'"/" 1 ' 1 mainui "'«i? *» ~, , 1a " r, ' lurn on ew. supponin, and am deprived of ;i vo!p ,n the dtv the ,I,strict in , , , - renders useful service for nearl?tfij Ul> :. -'mp.y !«v a ii-o mv f at w happily ,n|| -, ;aIV<I Ul UK from Auckland. Fallowing , hu met to hs laical conclusion, it S seem that 1 must eithor di parent or com ineo the town clerk the borough council that 1 have m,« r rolled bitterly with my t'amilv. andean under no circum stances return to old x-hiidhooil home, when or if I |..® J n-v present -mployment. in which I happen to I*. interested and have Bn intent,on 0, suing Thc .. all the more strange because I learn that some of my fellow „ ursc atto J ant.-, also living in at the Infirmarv who have Ik-cu there for manv vear*! have been able to vote at previous eW Hons Is this regulation then a nt« one which will result in their also bein? disfranchised: VOTES FOR WOMEV