FILM VULGARITY.
"What the Australian censors say about certain classes of imported films is thought by many. It is not that the cinema, as represented by these pictures, is immoral, but that it is vulgar. What it needs, say these judges, is "more refinement of feeling and sentiment." Unfortunately, as an English investigator recently reported, the measure of a great deal of the work done in America is the intelligence of what is called the "hick"; that is to say, a picture is designed to please the average inhabitant of the country town, and if it pleases him all is well. The censors' report illustrates the difficulty of censorship. Downright indecency can be censored, but vulgarity is an elusive thing. The most melancholy feature of the report, however, is that only half a million feet of British films were brought into Australia last year against fifteen and a-half million of American. The monopoly Hollywood is almost complete, and if ustxalia shows signs of being Americanised no one need be surprised,
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19270310.2.32
Bibliographic details
Auckland Star, Volume LVIII, Issue 58, 10 March 1927, Page 6
Word Count
170FILM VULGARITY. Auckland Star, Volume LVIII, Issue 58, 10 March 1927, Page 6
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Auckland Star. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Auckland Libraries.