NO BREACH OF PROMISE
THE CHRISTCHUBCH CASE,
KXGAGEMICXT MUTUALLY
BROKEN. illy Tck'sraph.—l'ress Association.) CHRIBTCHURCH, this day. ! The hearing of the claim for il'iOO jJamages for alleged breach of promise was continued in the Supreme (.'ourt I yt'sterday before Mr. Justice Adam.*. ■ flic plaintiff was NY.lie Ketu-nhurg, of J Christchureh, ?pinster, and the de- ' α-ndant, Midiael McCormiek, of LakeI h:du. farmer. i After hearing the evidence of J plaintiff, defendant, and o'.lier wit- ■ hi- Honor, in awarding judp- ; nient for defendant with costs, -aid he I wa- not pre-pared to say that three v.itne-if's li;id come before the court with a trumped-up story and had •sworn to falseiioods. He preferred tv believe that plaintiff had failed to ••;;rry away the correct impression of the conversation which was alleged to '.lave taken place. He found that the I contract had been terminated by mutual 'consent when the last conversation took Iplacj between plaintiff and defendant in thu hearing of two witnesses.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19260831.2.66
Bibliographic details
Auckland Star, Volume LVII, Issue 206, 31 August 1926, Page 7
Word Count
159NO BREACH OF PROMISE Auckland Star, Volume LVII, Issue 206, 31 August 1926, Page 7
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Auckland Star. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Auckland Libraries.