Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

DIVORCE COURT.

UNDEFENDED PETITIONS. DECREES AND ORDERS GRANTED. A number of undefended petitions in divorce came before his Honor Mr. Justice Herdnian at the Auckland Supreme Court to-day. Rachael Emily Maud Boreham (Mr. Matthews), who was married in December. U»l-, at (jisborne, to Charles John Boreham, said the marriage proved unhappy, and there was a separation in ]f»l9. This came about because of incompatibility of some kind. She had only "ccn the respondent once since the parting. A decree was granted. A mutual feeling that they were better apart was the reason lor a separation between Flossie Moxon Chilruan (Mr. Matthews) and lames Richard Chilman, who were married at. Auckland in 1906. They had been apart since November, 1018, and a decree nisi was granted.

The fact that she could not agree with her husband's people, with whom -he had to live, was given as the reason for Violet Maud Smith (Mr. f. F. W. Dickson) leaving Harold Arthur Smi'b, whom she married in 1910. The separation took place in 1917. A decree was granted. babel Vivian Baggstrom iMr. Matthews! petitioned for a divorce from Edward Lemuel Baggstrora. oin the jrround of separation. Petitioner said (-he was married on March 18, I!U4, and separated on March 14, 191"), her husband's conduct and being tile cause. A decree was granted,

A decree nisi was granted to Matthew Findlay (Mr. Vallanee), who gave evidence that Isabel Kindlay had not Complied with an order for restitution of conjugal rights. The parties were married in ISHT.

Samuel Jones iMr. J. F. W. Dickson) told the Court that after two months" acquaintance with Violet Theresa Jones, an hotel waitress and a divorced woman, he married her on August 19, 1922. She only remained with him till December 2, No reason wa= given, but he had his suspicions, An order for restitution of conjugal rights was made.

An order for restitution of conjugal rights was granted to Emma Emily Ann Barker (Mr. Vallanee) against William Barker, The parties were married in November, 19J9, at St. Matthew's Church and lived together at Manurewa, where respondent was unsuccessful in hu.iness. Later ho refused to make a home for her, money matters causing the trouble.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19230228.2.117

Bibliographic details

Auckland Star, Volume LIV, Issue 50, 28 February 1923, Page 8

Word Count
366

DIVORCE COURT. Auckland Star, Volume LIV, Issue 50, 28 February 1923, Page 8

DIVORCE COURT. Auckland Star, Volume LIV, Issue 50, 28 February 1923, Page 8