S.M. COURT.

Auckland Star, Volume XLIII, Issue 205, 27 August 1912, Page 6

S.M. COURT.

(Before Mr C. C. Kettle. S.M.) IN" DE-FENDED CAS&S. Jadgiuen-t for pia|n.affe with costs, whs wll? "' }** ' 0110w ™s undefended cases - TYul-t«to.wers' 00-operat Ive sitFldftlJ; i'^ ,at>l Tobin (Freeman's £i« ->ai «; : ta -. y - •'' 1L DaTls (Ku'aotnnut. file 2/r. etatn (i-narunteed Advance Office jaiKi), ilj (,/; ft. Guason aud Co. v. Arthur (roves iPutarurui. £8 i;i/3: T. H. Hall and < o. v. J. .1. MeNitmiira (Kotorua). £10 12/4: nrn.nliigUam ami Co. v. iieor S e Williams WaUn.il). £8 8/3; Wai-Wai Mineral Water ' ii?.' t. A. ('. - N,,rris fl'utientua), £."1 1AI; Wingiite ami Co.. u<l., v. Hen "niompsoi! (Merciu-y Bay), £1 6/: -Pl-orrle lieveney v Mre .1. Kurnej- (Auckland). £1 2/; Kathleen 'IWeney v. Mrs .1. Kurney (Auckland) £1 '■!/: .Tosepjh IT. Wood v. Samuel Brown tl-ambridse), £.1 11/1; Miss B. Duke v .1 W. Eraser (Auckland), £3 3': \v Cunningham v. Neale .I»>psoTi (Mt. Kden). £1 2/8; Roope Bros. v. Mre A. jlcCnUongh d'etottel £1: same v. Mrs F. Balnos (Petonel. £1 5/; Roy Mall v. Young On (lluntlvi, £1.1 J/7; Wjide an<l MoOra.tii t. Va! Atkinson (Auck landi. £2 8V; '.\Oliio and Choy<v I.XI v ■Mr ajid Mrs 11. Flavell lAmiKlanrti, £2 1,1: Tnuplri Coal Mine* Co. v. B. Marsh (Nijtartiawaiiiai. CIS 17/6: W. K. Williams v. F. Brljrse iXewm.-irketi, £« 1, ; B. RolxTts v. F. Appleton (ttnehungai. £1 ISo: Baraforrl and Brown v. G. R HAmilttftn (Aii-eKiaiitJi. • £21 4 : X.Z. : Portlsnd Ce.uielii Co.. 1,!<1.. v. A. Stacey end Cn. lOpoilKii. £12 4 ■: Whittome, Bt*Tenson. and Co., Ltd., v. A. Smrin (Auckland), £9 1/8.