RESTAURANTEUR AND TOBACCONIST.

Auckland Star, Volume XLII, Issue 135, 8 June 1911, Page 4

RESTAURANTEUR AND TOBACCONIST.

A decision i>l importance to wstatn»ll keepers -was :gireiu ; by.Jto.JC..α-jiettl* 531,," tins morning, . T|e fcion was where a Chinaman w&l§& was summoned-at the inst*Ke;M p-_ -Inspector -of Factories restaurant open oniWeitoej^!!™?. moon' May 3. cbatriiy. -to &» ; fcSff!? ~oi tELe ; Shi>p and Offices: , 1910. The Inspector contenijaj »n» defendant'must close'fiis » fcfee-hojiday because.he. door a" cabinet whif*-cp9WP«f-;wWS-Mr. Kettle said he had gone into the matter, in" many inconsistencies in the : Offices Act of 1908 and il>e amended of 1910. He gathered; howCTer,:ftrt«f legislature on the'w'hole , deajew?*? fair as possibfe in <?rder tftifjWee"" might cany on thea-; If a restaurant or any sttop ""P* , and sold it ■wOien.-tobacconiste'»?i?*i*" to be .closed, they .-wauld. advantage: The question the defendant be compelled-to, restaurant because: Tie cold for the convenience' of Ma e^^^ T daring the week. The provision for a-case of i kind, but .he ; section wWch .dealt wt^ ; which provided Cat jnighfenot be » u PPi ie *S the tobaceonifit's. Jdosinr h ???i_SS to restaurants, and therefore noflave' to be closed, i .^ c Said he had- .been sfcruggijng/?. could find out what the tree . was, and he confessed he impossible.to arrive at a ; to satisfy himself. - li Iβ. : The information was <i ! Hood (Inspector of- Factories) sajW • question was a most unportant ot . would give notice of appeal, w- f nne3 i, "-Instead of spending money I should tiunk it would be f:fchese Acts thoroughly overh»tUeH-. ...

• —■ '--- : ■ Buring the hearing of '_£.*&% tL Christchurch Court pMJ? day morning, in which *£*££«& een yeaTs was charged with arun*««»• -~ the Magistrate (Mr. H. W. drew attention to the fact .that »« *, prohibited youtta-under 21 yeBJ beiag served in hotels. McGrath replied that it very common custom for y*nng.«W who were not allowed to buy bottles of UqAor and W;e i arav to consume the contents. was the ooune thai had been the present instance, and no provided by the Act ior such a^ro^: