S.M. COURT.

Auckland Star, Volume XLI, Issue 205, 30 August 1910, Page 2

S.M. COURT.

(Before Mr *.'. C. Kettle, S.M.)

Judgment went for plaintiff by default iv the following undefended cases:—Norton Bros. v. 11. Boagey (Fatca). £5 19/- John Pound v. Harry Cliitty, £4: T. aid 11. Cook v. E. 1. Harrison (Hula), £3 17/S: W. Buchauati. Ltd., v. Patrick O'Brien (Ponsoubyi. £G 2/4; E 0. PiLkiujrton v. C. O. Phair (Ohine-.v;ii>, £!» 1 , /; Continental C. and G. Kubber Co. Proprietary, Ltd.. v. G. W. Laurencp (Alarton). £5!) S/3: Tyne Bros. v. J. Lemmon. Z'J li/Ti: executors Kobert Itew v. Mrs Young, £5 .1/9; same v. Frank Perrcan 'Taumaninui). £6 U/">: Collings and 801 lv. A. Kendail (Xortnoote). £1 9/1; Dufaur and Lees v. Sajnuel Graham, £0 Xj/S; C. SUort aJid Co. v. Robert 11. Bates (Ureen-lano). £4 3/; A. ti. Walker v. Thomas MeElroy (Grey Lynnl. £1 ;{/*>; R. 11. Wallis v. .lames Vincent, £1: Tanpo Totara Timber Co. v. n.irptr and Harkins, £14 1/2; sunif v. L. C. A. Potter, £14 2/2: G. Conrt and Sons v. K. AUdnson. £1 5/fi; X. Coheu v. A. G. Latlium (To Arohai, £1 S/; Ponsonby Druids' Lodße v. W. Bowman (Mount Kden-rn.idK 16/2: W. Gribble v. W. .1. Smith (Ilukan-ni). £i> c/S: .T-ohn Micliacl Shields v. I. Gelhor, £0S •-'/ C; TV. Dawson v. S. Plvock (Newton). £1 13/G; Roope Bros, (as assisnt-ps tor .1. J. Mackay. saddler), v. 11. Itobinsoii (Oaewlieroi. £SWm. Blakey v. Mrs Stpveneon, X/; Mrs W. H. Knock V. Douglas Gordon. £3 l.'t/K; L. Mitchell v. Pony E. Tharkrah. £4 ir,i; Auckland Carters' Union v. T. O. Hunt 18/: same r. C. Hill. IS/: D. Simpson and Son v. A. Harper. £23 IS/: A. Cleave and Co., Ltd., v. J. W. Lawrenre (Woodville). £4; N. Cohen * J j«, Aiulerson DLion (J.laanilu»D| £5. ... ", • ' £2 Jo/: Moewai fonsou dated G.II. Co. v. Jplin D. Perrett (Devonport), £1; Official Asslenep in the pniperty of W. F. Darby v. C. E. Graeff (Hamilton).. £6 3/5: D.S.C. v. G. Auderson (Mamaku). I.V: samp v. G. K. Bajmall (Turna). 15/S; same v. Maurice Kiely (Manawaru), £1 3/75. SHOEING HORSES. J. Wilkinson claimed £10 4/ from Arthur Selby for amount due for the shoeing of certain horses. After a short hearing, judgment went for plaintiff for the amount claimed, with £1 costs.