Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CANON NASH AND HIS ACCUSERS.

y. .{Received 8.35 a.m.) ' . LONDON. March 31. ■ .-inquiries show that the accusations *&"tet the Rev. Canon Nash, known as ™e.Ao. 2 charge, rest entirely upon the made by Canon Bardsley, who ___' r°f Hudde rsfield when Mr. cnrate there, to the Bishop of and others, which possibly Wg&jl Dr. Monte, Bishop of Durham. H Aloule now calls these statements Jsfay rumours, and Dr. Bardsley has H™™ on the subject as follows— jii-f,, 1 matter of justice and honour, lot rf eTldenee M » before mc. I can.fT™? my statement to the Bishop Archbishop says he holds written statements with the No. 2 charge, £°<jh « an accusation relating to Mr. conduct towards a lady member w : Union Bardsley. family, the gravity Jr* justifies his refusal to re-instate mm _ JSash as incumbent of Christ Miarch, Geelong." \ „i; ; .(Received 10.47 a-m.) . __ MELBOURNE, this day. ' J "* Christ Geelong, to give loyal support to no other 2°"? irf *» but that of Canon Nash un_rr ( T = Cnm . entai 3 r evidence were produced m their decision.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19080401.2.25.9

Bibliographic details

Auckland Star, Volume XXXIX, Issue 79, 1 April 1908, Page 5

Word Count
173

CANON NASH AND HIS ACCUSERS. Auckland Star, Volume XXXIX, Issue 79, 1 April 1908, Page 5

CANON NASH AND HIS ACCUSERS. Auckland Star, Volume XXXIX, Issue 79, 1 April 1908, Page 5