SLANDER OR CRITICISM?
' TSx. Pulsford and Mr. Wise. (Eeceived 7.39 a.m.) LO37DON, October 11. Senator Pulsford, in a letter to the ""Ernes," interprets the word '* slander " •ojed by Mr. Wise in his letter of the Bth iiatt. as implying unfavourable criticism, sAi adds: —"It is good for Australia to koW aU Views." Mr. Pulsford nest motions the Empire aspect of the tariff, discriminates between the United Kiaydom and British India. j Coffimenting on the prohibition of im- ' migration rinder contract in the ComjDouwtalth, and speaking of the results of Ms OTipiiries in England, Mr. Pulsford says: "It is affecting immigration from England 4° Australia every day of the jßarj.and' , is blocking schemes of enterprise in. aQ directions.
[Sena—r Pulsford is replying to a Iper from/Mr. B. B- Wise, formerly At-._cW-<j€—a— of New South Wales, de'.jsea&ng ther "flow of slander" against ___ta>]
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19071012.2.16.4
Bibliographic details
Auckland Star, Volume XXXVIII, Issue 244, 12 October 1907, Page 5
Word Count
141SLANDER OR CRITICISM? Auckland Star, Volume XXXVIII, Issue 244, 12 October 1907, Page 5
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Auckland Star. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Auckland Libraries.