Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

POLICE COURT.

THIS DAY.

(Before Mesgrs. H. Wilding, J. Trevithickj.and J. S. Diekson, J.P.'s.)

Inebriate.—John Leonard and George Wightmaii, for appearing the second time, were each fined 10/ and costs, in default 48 hours. Alary Ann Windsor was convicted and prohibited. Frank Oniff, for disorderliness while under the influence of liquor, was fined 10/ and cab hire, in default 48 hours. One first .•offender, who declared that it was no good frnrng a man who was broke; that he -was heartily ashamed of himself, and just -wanted to get a ship for the Old Connfcry, was given the usual choice of 5/ or 24 hours.

Another Chance.—A young woman named Alice Hartley, convicted of leading an idle and disorderly life, was discharged on the understanding that she should become an inmate of the Salvation Army Home for six months.

Prohibition. —A prohibition order was made against Theodore Bernard Jacobsen, on the application of his son.

By-law Breaches. —Sydney Frederick Harris and Harry McMiken were each fined 5/ and costs for driving after sunset without proper lights.

Failing to Register.—James Charles Murphy, for failing to register a birth, the omission being occasioned through a misunderstanding as to the time limit, paid a nominal fine and costs, totalling 10/.

A Day Out.—Two young men, George Siddens and Daniel O'Neil, were charged with having made matters generally lively in the vicinity of the Thames Hotel yesterday. Mr. J. R. Lundon defended. The evidence of Augustus Wheatly, the barman, was to the effect that the accused, with several other men, entered the hotel during the morning and demanded free drinks, one of them, upon a refusal, picking up a glass and throwing it at him. A little later they left, but in the course of the day they returned five or six times, and on each occasion things became pretty sultry, and the language blue. When Siddens was arrested by Constable Hunter he made steenuous and physical objection, for which he was also called upon to account, but failed to do so to the satisfaction of the presiding justiees,l*who fined him 40/ and costs, in default seven days' imprisonment, as a corrective in this respect. A similar penalty was inflicted upon Siddens for the use of obscene language. The information against O*Neil was dismissed.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19070725.2.15

Bibliographic details

Auckland Star, Volume XXXVIII, Issue 176, 25 July 1907, Page 2

Word Count
380

POLICE COURT. Auckland Star, Volume XXXVIII, Issue 176, 25 July 1907, Page 2

POLICE COURT. Auckland Star, Volume XXXVIII, Issue 176, 25 July 1907, Page 2