PAK-A-POO.

Auckland Star, Volume XXXVIII, Issue 171, 19 July 1907, Page 5

PAK-A-POO.

A GAME OF CHANokj

(By Telegraph,-*** -£s§o^

WELLINGTON, . The Full Bench sat at "' Court mston, Ci-apman, and ButtcmV? the case of- Joe.Gee v. wSnf tT was an appeal from Tba » Mr s|^u^|g chance, namely* pa j™i ™ **** <* ant was The inform.tion was 4feSlfe 18 of the Garmng and Lotteries Act, ISSI and cnarged appellant with. = P Tr a ticket by whhfh prizes were *§§§§ by the mode of-chance. ffiiS what conflicting Igglgg already given it was decided to" S the matter before the Full Cnm4 SvT Chapman, *& W m. Spo^lenT-^^^^lS

Mr. Chapman contended thif was no valid evidence ticket sold by appellant g« in.pursuance of a scheme tnoutto money by chance. The Crowl had not proved, that the shillinfwon by the respondent, a detective, w a nrize. •'.._•.'■'• *

" The case was. not concluded when tha Court adjourned. , '" "■ ~T Wellington; 'this. day.;. In the pak-a-poo case, Sir. Wilf6*n* fA* the appellant raised: tieras, and also urged, that, pak-a-poo'was-:.' S ? ♦ *k m prized 'Vera distobuted by- chance, as. made a separate wager; with the bank! ' and v he won could hot be. said to : - win!^ ; what was, ordinarily called a prize/ The money paid for the. ticket not a prize. : ;■ ".-■ --W Air. Myers, for the respondent cite* authorities to show that.'ui'AustraiH.aa. hefd ZZ WZ ??? nd ' heeii,, held to be. a lottery. . ' ■ '•.„">' '. ' ' "'..■:':li'.''' :•'