Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE CHARGE AGAINST A RESTAURANT KEEPER.

__*v- tTo th e. Edltor.l Sir,—We as workers in the railway oyster saloon wish to object to "white slavery," as printed in your paper.; last night.. We wish to statej as workers there, we have- never done more than nine hours a day.; including meals. If we wished, to work ten in one day we could take it off the next day—in fact, there is no work done in the shop after nine a.m. until. eight p.m. During, that tiriie we can do what we can either take our rest. or go for a walk, or enjoy ourselves or otherwise. As to selling tobacco, we have never seen any in this shop since we have been here, only for Mr. Franchi's private use. I can state as shopmSh I have, never sold tobacco, and never saw Mr. Franchi do so. We are the oldest employees since he first opened his saloon in' Lower Queen-street. If this is "white slavery," God help black slavery.—-We remain, as employees. - "'

GEORGE HOLT; THOMAS BARNES. ARTHUR SERVICE. MAY BENNEY.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19051024.2.19.1

Bibliographic details

Auckland Star, Volume XXXVI, Issue 254, 24 October 1905, Page 2

Word Count
180

THE CHARGE AGAINST A RESTAURANT KEEPER. Auckland Star, Volume XXXVI, Issue 254, 24 October 1905, Page 2

THE CHARGE AGAINST A RESTAURANT KEEPER. Auckland Star, Volume XXXVI, Issue 254, 24 October 1905, Page 2