S.M. COURT.—THIS DAY.

Auckland Star, Volume XXXV, Issue 198, 19 August 1904, Page 8

S.M. COURT.—THIS DAY.

(Before Mr O. C. Kettle, S.M.) I'luintiff Nonsuited.—ln the case or Rk-h----.irU Henwood v. J. R. Lundoii, in which the plaintiff claimed £13 12/, His Worship nonsuited the plaintiff. Evidence had been heard, and Mr Kettle said that the point in dispute was as to what were the instructions to Mr Luudon by a witness named Foley. He regarded the latter as practically the plaintiff in the case, and he had admitted a prejudice again3t Mr Lundon, also that he had threatened to taie the defendant before the Law Society. He therefore nonsuited the plaintiff, and upon Mr Lundon'9 application allowed a guinea costs in respect to the appearance of a solicitor to argue the legal points oa behalf of the defendant. A Defended Ccse.—Mr Slteiton appeared on behalf of Adrian Wilkins, against whom Matl Lovich claimed £4 tj/1 for moneys. alleged to have been paid on the defendant's account. After hearing the evidence His Worship gave judgment for the plaintiff, With costs, to the estent of £1 4/, which the defendant had admitted in writIns to be due. Judgment Summonses.—ln the following rases the defendants were ordered to pay the amounts due within 14 days, or be imprisoned in default:—Francis O'Dowd v Phillip Dudson, £25 13/; J. W. Brtdgman v. James Baaaett, £13 S/G: G. McKeliar v T. Wright, £21 7/6; A. Erickson t DavW Brown, £8 8/e; H. t>. Bnrrage % Bobwt