S.M. COURT.—YESTERDAY.

Auckland Star, Volume XXXII, Issue 15, 18 January 1901, Page 2

S.M. COURT.—YESTERDAY.

(Before Mr H. W. Brabant, S.M.)

Judgment was given for the vplalntiffs in the following undefended cases: — Alliance Assurance Co. v. John T. Seymour, £30 0/0, anil costs £2 14/; Cook and Gray v. E. J. Xlulhern. claim £11 !>/, with costs £2 12/G: T. and S. Morrin, Limited, v. C. W. Harris, claim £-3 W-'!, with costs £1 17/0: Arch. Chirk and Sons, Limited, v. L. A. Subritzky, einliu i_o V./4, with costs £2 vl9/; Direct Supply Co. v. Thos. Foley, claim £11 10/11, witn costs 25/0: Surah A. Heightou v. Jus. Collins, claim £3 10/. with costs 10/; F. D. Woodroffe and Co. v. Liugi Cherchi, claim £10 3/8, With costs 25/0; L. D. Nathan and Co. v. Harry Hetit, claim £5S 8/2, with corts £I> 10/; John Burns and Co. v. Thos. H. Wellington,' ciaini £-1 15/, with costs £1 "s/: John 'Allen v. James Black, claim £S 15/4 • with costs _3/(>; A. Dolphin and Co. v. Thomas Wright, claim £5 0/0, with rests 24/0; Gilmore nnd Co. v. T. J. Nichols, claim £20 .",/", with costs £2 10/; A. O. Carter v. W. Parsons, claim 10/7, with costs 5/: John Mcllveen v. D. F. O'Sullivan. claim £14, with 15/ costs; Jos. Murphy v. Ceorge Smith, claim £1 14/7, with costs 5/; It. liew v. D. F. O'Sullivan, claim £1 11/, with costs 5/.

Defended Case.—VT. 11. Grove v. A. Pearson. Mr J. It. Reed for defendant.—The claim was £11 10/ for 17 crates of bananas. — The defendant paid £0 8/ into Court— The dispute arose as to the price per crate, plaintiff stating it was 12/6 and defendant alleging he arranged with plaintiff's son to purchase at 8/ per crate.—His Worship gave judgment for plaintiff, with costs £1.

George W. Wilcox v. Alexander Schultze, claim 15/ for wages. Mr McVeagh appeared for defendant. Judgment was given for defendant on the ground that the plaintiff broke the agreement by leaving before the week had elapsed.