Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

THURSDAY,

(Before Mr 11. W. Brabaut, S.M.)

UNDEFENDED CASES.

Tn the following; cases judgment

was entered for plaintiff by default: — tins. Wiseman v. Win. Long", claim £1 12/0, costs 1-V; Cook•nncl Gray v. P. Lavelle, claim £1 7/10, costs'o/; Cook and Gray v. K. Yoysey, claim £15 ]9/.->. cost's £1 .14/G; Cook and Cray v. J{. Peterson, claim £8 15/6, costs £1 10/ C; Cook and Gray v. .T. Parr, claim £19 1/7, costs £1 14/G; Tlios. Meredith v. Peter Dnvally, claim 0/!$ costs 5/; Arch. Clark and Sons v. W. 1). Autheran, claim £10 19/3, costs £1 10/ C; W. J. Hurst and Co. v. .fas. Bregnen, claim €13 11/S.costs £1 5/; Alex. Aitken and Co. v. J. D. McLeod, claim £1 0/. costs 15/; J. Ehrman and Co. v. 11. Wake, claim £312, costs £1 :)/; Direct Supply Co. v. P. W. Thomas, claim £1 IG/8, costs 5/; Buchanan and Co. v. J. F. Watson, claim .£1 4A costs 5/; A. Woollams and Co. v. E. L. Haigli, claim £7, costs j £ 1 3/6; J. Ehrman & Co. v. Jas. Smith, ; claim £4 2/G, costs 10/; K. Furness & Co. v. C. Skellern, claim £3 9/, costs; 10/; Hospitable and Charitable Aid j

Board v. Alf. Arnold, claim £12 4/, costs 15/; Hospital and Charitable Aid Board v. Cuthbert Leathart, claim £20 10/, costs £1 3/; Abbott Oram and Co. v. J. Galbraith, claim £4 1/3, costs 15/; Warren Blyth and Co. v. Mrs Raynor, claim £2 2/4, costs 5/; Warren Blyth and Co. v. — Morris, claim £2 0/0, costs 5/.

Defended Cases.—North German Fire Insurance Company of Hamburgand George S. Graham v. Fred. E. Sutton. His Worship gave judgment for the amount claimed, £2 1/4, with costs 11/. Mr J. 11. Eeed appeared for the plaintiffs. Wm, McCulloug'h v. the Mayor, Councillors, and Citizens of Auckland, Jclaim of £135 for printing catalogues alleged to have been performed with the authority of the City Council. Mr Theo. Cooper appeared for the plaintiff, and Mr Thos. Cotter, city solicitor, conducted the case on behalf of the Council. The examination of Mr T J. A. Philips was continued. Robert Farrell, contractor, and Alex. Gorrie, assistant town clerk, were also examined, when the case was ad-

journed

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS18990203.2.32

Bibliographic details

Auckland Star, Volume XXX, Issue 28, 3 February 1899, Page 8

Word Count
375

MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Auckland Star, Volume XXX, Issue 28, 3 February 1899, Page 8

MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Auckland Star, Volume XXX, Issue 28, 3 February 1899, Page 8