AN ELECTION ROW.
POLICE COURT PROCEEDINGS.
Two young men named James Edmonds, alais Kitzgerald, and Albert Edward Glover were charged at the Police Court to-day with disturbing a public meeting, a school election to wit, held in St. James' Hall last Monday evening. There was a HtiCOild charge against both, of assaulting Thomas Armstrong, by striking him with their clenched fists.
Dr. Laishloy appeared for the defendants, and pleaded "guilty, under justifiable circumstances" on behalf of Edmonds, and not guilty to both charges against Glover. Mr Burton conducted the prosecution. Armstrong, a middle-aged man who described himself as a commission agent, said the meeting was a-noisy one. He was asking the returning oHicei a question when one of the defendants called out to him to "shut up." He replied, "shut up yourself," whereupon Glover struck him on the side of the head. They left the building after that, but witness came in again and sat down beside a friend. About'iO minutes after the first assault Edmonds struck him full in the face, saying-, "Take that, you old !" At the same time some one struck him on tho back of the head. He then heard Glover's voice, urging the other defendant to run away. Asa result of the blows, Armstrong was unable to leave his house for three days, his eyes being closed up and his face swollen.
Dr. Laishley: Were you not put out of the hall by a man named Worthington before the assault?— No.
Didn't you raise your stick as if to strike somebody ?— T did not.
In answer to further questions the witness said lie was " as sober as the most of them," and had not been drinking "particularly."
Constable Douthett gave corroborative evidence. He slated that (Hover struck Armstrong as lie was falling from the force of Edmond's blow. The first blow knocked Armstrong nearly insensible, and tho second was equally hard. Evidence was also given by John Gordon, who presided at the meeting, John Preston, Robert Findlay and William Earle, who were present at the meeting. Several other witnesses for the prosecution were examined after the luncheon adjournment, giving corroborative evidence as to the assault. The case for the pro-i secution occupied the Court till three" o'clock.
Dr. Laishley, in opening his defence, said that far from the accused having no right to be present at the meeting, it was a most hopeful and creditable fact that young men glowing up in our midst should evince such an interest in the education of the young. The case for tho defence was proceeding when we went to press.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS18980502.2.38
Bibliographic details
Auckland Star, Volume XXIX, Issue 102, 2 May 1898, Page 3
Word Count
432AN ELECTION ROW. Auckland Star, Volume XXIX, Issue 102, 2 May 1898, Page 3
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Auckland Libraries.