MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

Auckland Star, Volume XXVIII, Issue 257, 5 November 1897, Page 3

MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

THURSDAY

(Before Mr 11. W. Brabant, S.M.)

UNDEFENDED CASES.

Judgment Avas given for plaintiff by default in the folloAving cases:—W. H. and H. C. Wright v. Mrs Matthews, £7, costs 18s 6d ; Janet Zein v. Eflie Murray, £3 7s 6d, costs 10s; Wm. Bowman v. Walter J. Price, £2 3s 10d, costs lis; Wm. B. Cook and Win. Gray v. F. Teddy, £34 Ss 3d, costs £3 5s 6d ; Wm. R. Cook and Wm. Gray v. F. Tramer, £3 17s, costs 12s; Wm. R. Coolvand Win. Cray v. Wm. Saunders, £20 lis sd, costs £3 ss'Gd ; Wm. R. Cook and Wm. Gray v. Wm. McLean and Thos. Liddell, £6 16s 9d. costs £1 ISs Cd ; Wm. R. Cook and W. Gray v. G. Gillmore, £16 Is Sd, costs £1 10s Od ; Wm. R. Cook and W. Gray v. W. Galley, £1 8s lOd, costs ss; W. R. Cook and W. Gray v. J. Daley, £6 lGs sd, costs £1 3s 6d ; W. R. Cook and W. Gray v. Chas. Wedge, £3 2s lOd, costs 10s ; W. li. Cook and W. Gray v. J. Stackpolo, £1 19s, costs ss; W. R. 'Cook and W. Gray v. A. Barrett, £11 3s, costs £1 12s; W* It. Cook and W. Gray v. Wm. Barrett, £1 12s Id, costs 9s; W. 'ii. Webbc v. Mrs M. A. Murchie, £5 Gs Sd, costs £1 3s 6d ; J. Tonson Garlick v. Harriet Coo, £0 17s 6d, costs £1 3s 6d ; Geo. Mcßride v. J. Severn, £4 ss, costs 10s ; G. Mcßride v. Sidney Haigh, £3, costs 10s ;* G. Mcßride v. A. Crowe, £5, costs £1 0s (3d; G. McBride v. R. B. Askinson, £1 2s Gd, costs ss; G. Mcßride v. E. Brady, £3 10s, costs 10s; John Allen v. Mrs M. Coe, £8 12s, costs £1 3s Gd; Frank C. AndreAvs v. Annie Wilkinson, ISs lid, costs 5s ; Peter Oliphant v. Agnes Prcece, £13, costs 15s; C. Wilson v. T. Elliott, £20 17s 9d; costs, £214s DEFKNDED CASKS. Rosa Todd v, Adam McMurtrie. Claim £5 or return of goods.—MrGittos appeared for the plaintiff, and Mr Burton for the defence.—The latter admitted plaintiff's OAA'nership of the goods, but denied that any demand had been made for them. — Judgment Avas given for plaintiff for the delivery of the goods, eacli party to pay their OAvn costs.

Edward O'Keefe v. David Grace. Claim £3 15s.—Mr Mahony appeared for the plaintiff.—The money claimed avos alleged to be the balance Avith 15s interest of a sum lent to the defendant. — The latter admitted the debt, but denied that tnere was any coutract to pay interest.—Judgment Avas giA*en for plaintiff for the amount claimed Avith costs £1 12s.

Patrick Kean a*. Mrs Dore.—Claim £6 or return of goods. There Avas a counterclaim for £1 17s. His Worship gave judgment for plaintiff, and allowed Is on the counterclaim, each party to pay their own costs.