MAGISTRATE'S COURT.-(THIS DAY.)

Auckland Star, Volume XXV, Issue 231, 27 September 1894, Page 5

MAGISTRATE'S COURT.-(THIS DAY.)

(Before H. W. Northcroft, Esq., S.M.J

UNDEFENDED CASES,

Judgment was given for the plaintiff in the' following undefended cases : — Walter j Dawsoa v. Louis Grey Magill (judgment for £1 8a) costs,7s; A. J. Entrican v. Hector McQaarrie, claim £36 13s sd, costs £3 Is ; Paterson and Co. v. Charles McCormick, claim £10s 3s 7d, costs £2 5s 6d; Stone Bros, and Co. v. Chas. McCormick, claim £11 Is, cost, £2 5s 6d ; Jaggerand Parker v. Cha?. White (judgment for £4 4s 7d, £4 having been paid by P.O. order), coßts £1 5a 6d ; James Rae v. Thos. J. B. Smith, claim £2 4s, coßta 4s ; Harry Maxfield v. Frances Hay Chapman, claim' £5, costs 6s; John Platb v. Cecil Ball, claim £2 9s, coats lla ; Geo. Johnston v. Wm. H. Fenton, claim £2 Is Bd, costs 11s ; John Peter Hooton v. Wm. H. Fenfeon, claim £17 11s 4d, costs £1 15s 6d ; John Young v. R. Mitchell, claim £9 11b, costs 6s ; T. and S. Morrin and Co. v,

G. H. Selby, claim £5 13 lOd (money paid without costs), judgment for costs, 13a; Richard Laishley v. Margaret Beith, claim £118, costs 6b ; Wra. S. Jones v. George Andrews, claim £2 7s Bd, costs 7s; M. S. Laurie v. Edward Lawrence, claim £V 2a Bd, costs 6s ; Charles Spencer v. Mortoa Cowie, claim £2 11s (judgment' for £2 7? 6d), costs 11s; Robert Russell v. John Wilson, claim 5s 3d, costs 6s. Alfred Kidd, R. T. Michaels, anb George Peace (trustees of Auckland Lodge of' U.A.0.D.), v. John Brown.—Claim, £54, interest due under a mortgage.—Geo. Peace proved the claim, and stated defendant (who did not appear) kad admitted the debt to witness.—Judgment for amount) claimed with cobJis, £4 7s. defended cases. Arthur Cleave v. John Bertie.— Claim, £1 16s 8d advertising in New Zealand Bradshaw, The evidence of defendant, a * hotel-keeper, had been taken ab Carterton. Plaintiff's canvasser gave evidence. Judgment was given for the amount claimed with costs 6s. James Hunter v. Frederick Calgher. —Plaintiff, who is an hotelkeeper at Parnell sued defendant; for £22 7s, for board and lodging, £2 money lent and refreshments supplied.—Mr Gibtos appeared for plaintiff, arid Mr Baume for defendant. Mr Baume took objection to the claim for refreshments and money lent, submitting thab the items were not full and explicit as required by the Act. The dates were nbti given when the refreshments were' supplied.— Mr Northcrofb upheld the objection and £6 12s of the claim was struckout. The evidence of defendant had been taken ab New Plymouth.—Plaintiff in his evidence stated that the claim arose in connection with the trotting horses Peter and Tinker. Judgment was given for the plaintiff for £15 15s, with* costs £4 9s. ,:■> ,