R.M. COURT.—THIS DAY.

Auckland Star, Volume XX, Issue 193, 15 August 1889, Page 8

R.M. COURT.—THIS DAY.

(Before Dr. Giles, 8.M.)

UNDEFENDED CASES. Judgment was given for the plaintiffs in the following undefended cases : - Andrew McClymont v. Daniel Oxley, claim £8 19s 6d ; A. Clark and Son v. P. Barrio, claim £68 15s 10d; W. S. Whitley v. W. Taylor, claim £1 18a 3d; H. E. Par! ridge and Co. v. G. E. Suunder3, claim £4 23 ; Adam Laybourn v. Martha F. Osborne and Robert McClymont, claim £25 13s 5d ; Auckland Permanent Co-opera-tive Building and Investment Society v. Henry Meurant, claim £46 10s ; .Phcebe Liprinirwell v. William Love, claim £5 ; Auckland Harbour Board V. G. Tyler, claim £8 ; North New Zealand Woollen Manufactuiingr Company v. J. Ambury, claim £1 5s 6d ; McCullough and Co. v. C. Orchard, claim £5 8s 10.1 ; H. H. Cooke v. Patrick Collins, claim £1 13s 9d. NONSUIT. M. Casey v. Adam Emkrale.—Claim, £4, for goods supplied.—Mr Clendon, who appeared for the plaintiff, accepted a nonsuit. DEFENDED CASES. His Worship gave judgment for the plaintiff this morning in the case of T. Quoi v. Alfred Masefield, steward on board the s.s. Waihora. The claim was for £8 7s 6d for board and lodging.—Mr J. A. Tole appeared for the plaintiff, and Mr J. O'Meagher ior the defendant. J Moses v. Hekniman and Othkrs. —This was a claim for £7 103 due on balance of E. W. Burton appeared , for the pteMtMand Mr E. Cooper fov the female defendant.—Evidenco was giveu by Louis -Mpeee when tho Court adjourned,