R.M. COURT.-THIS DAY.
I- ,-,-' ..: . ."- - ' _"^ —: — "', -. | 6 , (Before Dr. Giles, R.M.) j Jo_3GM_N__ SUMMONS CASiSS. Ephraim" J. Thomas v! A. 'J. Knight.— Claim, £3'Ax 4d. —Order ; inad^for paymenb '-■.'■''■'-■by-ins,talDj^bs-(.f 2H6dweekhS, Gi:o. McQaui v. Jno. RtoJfrARDSON,— ! : ,; -■ Cki'H'fxi9ps|*6d.—Mr Baume appeared for j. the plaintiff and Mr Whitaker for the defendant,— Tho defendant was examined I' "" and consented bo an order for 2s ud per T **- week. :Dk.-Mor|§-Y Moore v. Henry Wilson. I^Claim;. £4?ls -6d. s-Mr Burton' for pla intiif ndMr Bra^seyfoE defendant.—Mr Brassey !__td^.ai-s;japplication thab an order of the lourb for* payment of tht^amOunt made on )ctofe* Btb,; 1887^§hpuipbe reversed, the -fendant having been then absenb from he-Mbny, and new not in a position to ia y Hs^ckiih.—The defendant having been xamihedj; Mis, VWorship suspended the rde-.'f6ral'imbnch, .'■ . .■:-'.■-.■ '--.-;■ "; J_.s.;RiU-.--v. j;•-.; J. Dignan.—Claim, £11 9fl. -An order was avade for; payment in he'month, Vaili: Al<D Doui ilas. v.' Ep\yAß» Jones. |Cl^&ifa.o:^s';7di--Jn. this case, which was dtaird 'yesterday afteirnoon, plaintiff acjpted a rion.SSb with cosbs, £1.175. It. I_:ia*7.s v, G. R. Burnett.—Claim, 218s 3d.—MrHumphreysappeared for the Mn till' and Mr Johnson for bho defendant. |ll_B was an*|ecion upon which plaintiff all l-ben nonsuited. Since then, he liad one through his books and was now able > show tho whole of the .transactions fttween himself a_d the defendant. The efendanfc was ior pome time the: .ndldrd ots the Hplairibilf, " the defendjMße(sß|ving; uiea. -land the plaintiff lyt_K him credit tor certain sums inrged for rent. Tlie ..accounts which i .plaintiff allegedly ere chargablejigainst ifj defendant .amounted to. £13 3s 3Jd,. gainst which tho defendant received reditas ££Jss for rentand for cash.on account 2, lca\ ing a balance of £2 18s 3j_d. The one of oontontioii was on account of a nice erected by tho plaintiff at a cost of £5 .3 sd, upon 'which the plaintiff alleged iat the defendant agreed to pay half cost. "wa. given on both sides, the sfence being.that no; agreement had been itere<|«^tO*by the defendant as to paying all cqst.-JHis Worship came to the conusion that no agreement had been proved, jd there being no legal obligation on the •fendant he gave, -judgmehb for; the defenGeoege B.mt.ey v. Miss Arnold.—Claim, 1. — ■ Mr Buckland appeared for plainfr: and' Mi" O'Meagher for the de-Adndanfc.4-o_wihg to" the illness of Mr ailey, •'who was ,an important witness, ,g; case, was ordered to stand over for a Ciiari/E- Lanton v. B. C. Roberts.— Sifi^ A "£&■ 10a.-^-Mr O'Meagher appeared f plaintiff. There was no appearance of 'fendant, and judgmenb was given for aintiff wiiffcosba £2. s.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS18880921.2.38
Bibliographic details
Auckland Star, Volume XIX, Issue 223, 21 September 1888, Page 4
Word Count
415R.M. COURT.-THIS DAY. Auckland Star, Volume XIX, Issue 223, 21 September 1888, Page 4
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Auckland Libraries.