R.M. COURT.-THIS DAY.

Auckland Star, Volume XIX, Issue 223, 21 September 1888, Page 4

R.M. COURT.-THIS DAY.

I- ,-,-' ..: . ."- - ' _"^ —: — "', -. | 6 , (Before Dr. Giles, R.M.) j Jo_3GM_N__ SUMMONS CASiSS. Ephraim" J. Thomas v! A. 'J. Knight.— Claim, £3'Ax 4d. —Order ; inad^for paymenb '-■.'■''■'-■by-ins,talDj^bs-(.f 2H6dweekhS, Gi:o. McQaui v. Jno. RtoJfrARDSON,— ! : ,; -■ Cki'H'fxi9ps|*6d.—Mr Baume appeared for j. the plaintiff and Mr Whitaker for the defendant,— Tho defendant was examined I' "" and consented bo an order for 2s ud per T **- week. :Dk.-Mor|§-Y Moore v. Henry Wilson. I^Claim;. £4?ls -6d. s-Mr Burton' for pla intiif ndMr Bra^seyfoE defendant.—Mr Brassey !__td^.ai-s;japplication thab an order of the lourb for* payment of tht^amOunt made on )ctofe* Btb,; 1887^§hpuipbe reversed, the -fendant having been then absenb from he-Mbny, and new not in a position to ia y Hs^ckiih.—The defendant having been xamihedj; Mis, VWorship suspended the rde-.'f6ral'imbnch, .'■ . .■:-'.■-.■ '--.-;■ "; J_.s.;RiU-.--v. j;•-.; J. Dignan.—Claim, £11 9fl. -An order was avade for; payment in he'month, Vaili: Al<D Doui ilas. v.' Ep\yAß» Jones. |Cl^&ifa.o:^s';7di--Jn. this case, which was dtaird 'yesterday afteirnoon, plaintiff acjpted a rion.SSb with cosbs, £1.175. It. I_:ia*7.s v, G. R. Burnett.—Claim, 218s 3d.—MrHumphreysappeared for the Mn till' and Mr Johnson for bho defendant. |ll_B was an*|ecion upon which plaintiff all l-ben nonsuited. Since then, he liad one through his books and was now able > show tho whole of the .transactions fttween himself a_d the defendant. The efendanfc was ior pome time the: .ndldrd ots the Hplairibilf, " the defendjMße(sß|ving; uiea. -land the plaintiff lyt_K him credit tor certain sums inrged for rent. Tlie ..accounts which i .plaintiff allegedly ere chargablejigainst ifj defendant .amounted to. £13 3s 3Jd,. gainst which tho defendant received reditas ££Jss for rentand for cash.on account 2, lca\ ing a balance of £2 18s 3j_d. The one of oontontioii was on account of a nice erected by tho plaintiff at a cost of £5 .3 sd, upon 'which the plaintiff alleged iat the defendant agreed to pay half cost. "wa. given on both sides, the sfence being.that no; agreement had been itere<|«^tO*by the defendant as to paying all cqst.-JHis Worship came to the conusion that no agreement had been proved, jd there being no legal obligation on the •fendant he gave, -judgmehb for; the defenGeoege B.mt.ey v. Miss Arnold.—Claim, 1. — ■ Mr Buckland appeared for plainfr: and' Mi" O'Meagher for the de-Adndanfc.4-o_wihg to" the illness of Mr ailey, •'who was ,an important witness, ,g; case, was ordered to stand over for a Ciiari/E- Lanton v. B. C. Roberts.— Sifi^ A "£&■ 10a.-^-Mr O'Meagher appeared f plaintiff. There was no appearance of 'fendant, and judgmenb was given for aintiff wiiffcosba £2. s.