R.M. COURT.-THIS DAY-

Auckland Star, Volume XIX, Issue 222, 20 September 1888, Page 5

R.M. COURT.-THIS DAY-

- (Before Dr. Giles, R.M.) JUDGMENTS FOR. FLAIHTIFFS. I , In the folio wine cases j udgmen ts went in favour; of plaintiffs, with costs:—Heather and Anpthtr v. Ah Long, £5 lls; J. Ferriday v. Mrs O'Don'neil, £1 lid; C. T. Wren ;V. James ;H. Hall, £4 10s sd; Johnston and Noble v. ; Mi&s; Holroyde, I£3 6s 6d; Theo. Cooper v. Arnold Grossman, £19 7s 9d; W. S. Whitley v. Todd and Gouden, £25 7s 9d ; A. J. Tapper, v. F. C. Newman, £112s 6d; Wm. Mason y. Henry Morris, 13s 3d; Jas. Prince y. Thomaß Ropers, £5 6s; Jas. Martin'v.Boper, £3:75;10d ; Jno. Oliver v.l Samuel Bray, 15s 9d; Hesketh and Aitken v, EL Smyth, £9 5s 8d ; Geo. Bailey v. Marfleeb, £1; A. T. Eyre;v. T. J. Ryan, £53 5s 5d ; King, Walker and Co/v.'C;^ Martin, £8 8s 6d ; ]?. Cook .v. :B. Dyer, -9s. 'Frederick W. ' SniiSh v. Ebenezer Brown, 19s JOd. ' '-*'' ■ ■'■■■ • ■: ■■ 'DEFENDED '" CASE& ''" • ' Vails aitd Doctglas v. Edward JoStes. — Claim' 110 4s 7d. —Mr Cooper appeared far the plaintiff!, and Mr O'Meagher for the defendant—This was au' action to recover a balance' due on accounts between the parties, and the dispute was almost confined to an item for commission oh the exchange of a property at Mount Eden for land, at Waiuku. A large amount of evidence was taken, and the case was proceeding when we went to ■press., ■ /■...■■.■.■" .■. ■ , ,■■ .:■■.'. .•.,,■.,. ~ . ' ' ' ■ ' - ___ '' ''V ' Sb. Matthew's Eve, which falls upon to- , night, is to bo celebrated, by a popular j entertainment at St;.e Matthew's Sohoolxoom, Hobson - street. An atttactiva ' fi'irograinine is announced^' 'and'Vth^' usual Iki Emission fee on this 'covers i lafreshments, so t^at i the devotees of t Ul. Matthew may expected to^prove i: I iri-'stty numerous. . ; : -:—- "in'ii" ' ' ' ■ ■ l ■' \ im mmm '