DISTRICT COURT. – This Day.

Auckland Star, Volume XXVI, Issue 4520, 24 November 1884, Page 2

DISTRICT COURT. - This Day.

(Before H. G. Seth Smith Esq., District Court Judce.) UNDEFENDED CASES. Judgment was given (or the plaintiffs in the following cases by default on the part of the defendants:—McNsb v. To Hemara, L 25 ss6d Du'aur v. Arama Karaka, L 61155; L. D. Nathan and-Co. v. G. C:- Hatdirig. L 39 2s 3d: O. H. Oacnondv. John Kolly, L 25 10s; J. Christopher v Stodart, L 32125; T. Morrin v. Albert Walker, ISM 133 Id. JUDQMI3KT SUMMpNa piSKS. ■W.Rattray v.E. T. Htll.'—-Claiir'.' £10 11s for goods suuplipd to debtor's" wife.-.An ordrir was made for paymont of tho aniount dainipd within a month, in default, C weeks' imprisonment. ADJOUESBD. ; National Fire and Marine Insruanoe Company v. S. Brooking, JC6S 3s Id. dbpendicdEoasbs. Thomaß Wyllie v. Geo Fraaer, claim, LIOO. daraaffcs for braaoh of agreement.—Mr Theo. Cooper for plaintiffi—Mr E. Hesketh for defendant—The plaintiff is an East Tainakl grazior, and the defendant an estate and commission agent, and the queatlou in disputo was one of fact with refersnee to the letting of a farm in Mdunt Wellington district, .Plaintiff claimed that defendant agreed to lot him- one portion, while dofendant as stoutly maintained that it was quite a different portion in respect to which toe agreement had bap.n an-lrad, »t,